Designing Living Bricks

The Architectural Drawing as Conversational Platform

Authors

  • Simone Ferracina Newcastle University. School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH02.09

Keywords:

architectural drawings, architectural control, living architecture

Abstract

The paper argues that the architectural drawing, as a technology for thinking and communicating design ideas between project stakeholders, has remained largely untouched by the advent of Actor-network theory (ANT) and the so-called ‘ethnographic turn.’ Rather than changing to reflect a distributed understanding of agency or the lived on-goingness of projects and buildings, the drawing continues to describe a simple line (from agent to patient) and to congeal into artifacts used to impart commands, increase the architect’s status or construct brands (the monologue-drawing and the brand-drawing). From the perspective of Living Architecture, an EU-funded research scheme combining architecture, bio-energy and synthetic biology, the paper proposes new modes of drawing (the medium-drawing, the exaptation-drawing and the seed-drawing) that challenge binary abstractions and demand that the architect relinquish a measure of authorship and control to engage in conversations with the other?–?large and small, disciplinary and non-disciplinary, human and nonhuman, alive and inert.

Author Biography

Simone Ferracina, Newcastle University. School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape

Newcastle University. School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape – simone.ferracina@newcastle.ac.uk

Published

05/23/2018

Issue

Section

Solicited Manuscript